So you accept the victim pyramid as valid, and categorize women and non-whites as oppressed? Now your takes make sense.
Seeing the world through that oppression matrix is the definition of Woke. Lol
No, as evident by the fact that i wrote the word "oppression" in quotes every time...
(And in my original post on the topic i also included the handicapped and the poor)
I wrote along the lines of IF the oppression olympics were valid, it still doesn't address the fact that these deviants and sodomites are CHOOSING their "oppression". They could just stop insisting on continuing their deviant behavior and go back to being normal, non-"oppressed" people... can't exactly stop being handicapped or a woman or minority.
You can feel free to label me "woke" though. Guess i'll be the worlds first homophobic, transphobic, been accused of being a woman hater, Christian woke person LOL
Who are these “right winger influencers?” Random posts from some internet forum, or comment section, are hard to accept as “influencing” anything.
People like matt walsh, andrew whatever his name is from daily stormer, the man formerly known as "heartiste" and other "manosphere" influencers, the gateway pundit, and the writers of assorted "alt" or conservative sites, among others. Other forums which obviously employ heavy moderation to steer other posters towards a form of group think, much like how they accuse the opposite "side" of behaving.
Given most people's need to have a sense of belonging, these videos, articles and posts absolutely do influence people. This is a goal of the elites, increasing division, polarization and radicalization of "both" sides. The mainstream "left" gets influenced by msm, the "right" gets influenced by their pick of alt/conservative news sites.
(Does this make me like one of your “right winger influencers?)
Well, i made the distinction early on that i wasn't accusing any random regular people with no platform of anything, but you still chose to defend them as if i were attacking you personally ... i'll let everyone draw their own conclusions.
No, racists are racist. It is conflating “right wingers” and racists/misogynists that makes you look like an anti-REEEEEcist kind of person.
The difference comes in what is considered to be "racism" and/or "misogyny".
If "racism" means lynching because of no motive but race, then 99.9% of people are not racist.
If "racism " means mocking black people's hair and discriminating in the workplace because of it, for example, our percentages now look different. Yet the "right" has called it woke to pass laws protecting their right to not be fired over their hair...
Same with "misogyny".
If it means actively trying to attack, r*pe, or kill women then most people are not "misogynists" (i hope...)
If it means seeing women as s*xual objects, condoning s*xual harrassment or objectification, and seeing consent as "woke", now we have a larger percentage. And as seen by the stories and tweets against that deviant dylan mulvaney, the "right" can't seem to stick to criticizing him, they have to criticize actual women's bodies in the process.
