enderpotato00
Star
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2017
- Messages
- 1,709
I say yes b/c not only is there proof, but wouldn't you think the Russians would've figured it out by now? But anyways your thoughts....
Some of these men are still alive and octogenarians, at that. Those that are dead were also well into their 80s, with little exception. That is well beyond the typical life expectancy of American men. So the effects don't seem to have affected them that much.There is much evidence pointing to the fact that they did go to the moon. There is a study which has shown that the astronauts who went there had a much greater rate of heart disease mortality than the other astronauts, due to the high level of radiation that they have been subjected to.
http://observer.com/2016/07/space-radiation-devastated-the-lives-of-apollo-astronauts/
Proof?Stanley Kubrick.
I'll just quote the article on that:Some of these men are still alive and octogenarians, at that. Those that are dead were also well into their 80s, with little exception. That is well beyond the typical life expectancy of American men. So the effects don't seem to have affected them that much.
And?I'll just quote the article on that:
"It’s important to note that according to the Review of NASA’s Longitudinal Study of Astronaut Health by the Institute of Medicine, astronauts have a significantly higher quality of life. Their incomes are relatively high, they are physically fit, and they have lifetime access to premium medical care. These factors should give them a substantially lower chance of cardiovascular-related illness compared to the similarly-aged general population. For the lunar astronauts, it didn’t, and it’s because of the unique environmental conditions they experienced."
It explains why astronauts have a much higher life expectancy than the normal citizen. Statistically, they should have much lower heart disease mortality, but they had much greater, which is significant.And?
That doesn't negate what I said.
Thats a terrible example of "proof" they went to the moon though...It explains why astronauts have a much higher life expectancy than the normal citizen. Statistically, they should have much lower heart disease mortality, but they had much greater, which is significant.
Didn't say it was proof. But it still is evidence.Thats a terrible example of "proof" they went to the moon though...
Indeed.Thats a terrible example of "proof" they went to the moon though...
I say no.I say yes b/c not only is there proof, but wouldn't you think the Russians would've figured it out by now? But anyways your thoughts....
I watched the 2nd plane hit on tv at work. That isn't to say they couldn't fake it then-- it's just strange. Surreal, really. :/I say no.
Because my paternal grandmother was alive during that time and told me it was a sham, and not to forget it.
It is just like how I tell my own kids who were too young/not born yet to always remember that people will dictate history but to remember that 9/11 was an inside job, no planes hit the twin towers & Building 7 imploded without anything touching it.
+1 for Stephen Greer.Yes, we went to the moon, BUT...
Nothing about the moon landing makes sense because of the fake footage, not to mention the reverse-engineered tech that was used which hardly anyone involved was aware of (highly compartmentalized for secrecy, "need-to-know" basis only)
Yes, I actually believed the story at the time. I think we were in such shock that we didn’t realize how absurd the narrative & footage was.I watched the 2nd plane hit on tv at work. That isn't to say they couldn't fake it then-- it's just strange. Surreal, really. :/