She is shaking
Macron is a fraud. Everything I've looked at explains Macron labels himself a centrist. He made campaign promises to the left but reneged on many of his claims. The authentic labor/left view him as right-wing (big business, lowered taxes for the wealthy, tightened immigration, conservative support, etc.). I guess the label can depend on your own place in the political spectrum.
I've been very sick so have missed this but that looks like a concentration camp a lá FEMA camps thats been discussed and showed on youtube since 2008.
Same thing in Sweden, they raised the retirement age here aswell despite protests. Its bc of the extreme migration our old now have to keep working to pay taxes for welfare the migrants can live off. NICE! really..reeaallly nice...
Centrist/left = Same shit.
Untrue. Globalism is an economic policy of the liberal right. It is diametrically opposed to labor unions and worker initiatives. Thankfully we can look to history to verify the reality:
Theyre cutting down the pensions furthure? This is CRAZY! What will they live off? AIR? Did you see that documentary about the yellow vests where they have to buy old meat bc they cant afford regular and if a light bulb goes out, they cant afford to switch it? This is genocide. Macron is starving them out while sitting in his fancy villa.
Calls Grow for Mass December 5th Protests Against French Pension Cuts
"There is growing support for strike action on December 5 against President Emmanuel Macron’s pension cuts and austerity measures. Initially, five unions in Paris mass transit had called for a strike on December 5 to postpone calls for further action, after a widely-followed September 16 strike and wildcat strikes in the National Railways (SNCF). Now, fearing growing social anger among broad layers of workers, the unions are reluctantly calling for broader strikes. There are signs that the mobilization could be large and could paralyze the French economy."
Yeah forget Encyclopedia Britannica, you should create your own encyclopedia!
Private employers also have the right to give and take away. How many companies have cut pension benefits and healthcare for their employees? Thousands probably.
Control the population? This is why nationalism will never work, they have no answers, only hyperbolic phrases/theories. The opposite of globalization is internationalism. We're defining terms to have a coherent conversation (or at least I thought that was the point). I said Obama's right/liberal economic policies. Liberal/ laissez-faire capitalism- pro-business, pro-investment, etc.
Exactly man. This is why the US is described as nearly fascist, with corporate and government leadership so closely tied. "Nationalism" wants to move world society back 200 years into selfish, tribal isolationism. I don't believe the masses want this. We care about the global population and the living standards of everyone. If the laborers, workers, true middle class of each country could somehow unite under policies to demand reforms and take back control of OUR governments, there could be immediate changes for the better.
1. Most successful companies (especially in tech) are started by people who come from affluent families and are educated and usually pretty smart and could easily find a well paying job. Their skills and family connections make starting a company easy because if it fails they'll be alright. For most people this is unrealistic because they have bills to pay or children to support. The average startup cost for a small business is around $30k, which most people just dont have, and dont have the means to save that much money for something that is likely to fail.