Kim petras (a man impersonating a woman) is on the cover of sports illustrated.
As i have almost come to expect by now, "conservative" articles miss the point while reporting the story: this is a MAN pretending to be female. Men pretending to be female should not be an excuse to criticize women's- actual women's- appearances.
pjmedia.com
This is all a stunning and brave celebration of Our Values™ like Diversity™ and whatever, but my first impression of the image below is that the dude has a serious
hip aesthetic problem that gives the whole game away.
He’s not what the LGBTQ+++™ people call “passing.”
Of course, The Science™ offers “hip feminization” hormones and surgery (
for a fee) to dudes like Kim Petras to
turn them into pretty ladies with the hallmark “hourglass” contours of a real woman.
And just like that, it's not about men pretending to be women. It's about women who don't have hourglass shape not being "
real women".
(So what does that make women without an hourglass shape? Men? Fake women who aren't "passing"?)
Ironically, the same website had another article (paywalled) titled "it wont be long before we're all expected
to assume everyone is transgender "
Don't they realize that by trying to arbitrarily decide based on aesthetics - and not chromosomes - what a woman is and is not, that they are contributing to this?
The article tries to go on about the real differences in the pelvises of males and females, but that has nothing to do with hip waist ratios. A woman, with a female pelvis but with a higher hip waist ratio is still able to go thru childbirth, which would be the reason for the pelvis differences. Men don't give birth.
I will save the rant about fake women who are not even athletes being featured on
sports magazines for another day...