Thunderian
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 7,515
Just you and the people you listen to.Guess everyone is a heretic..
Just you and the people you listen to.Guess everyone is a heretic..
Daniel's prophecy does not say the last week anywhere. The one week of the seventy weeks is not separated by 2000 years from the other 69 weeks. That isn't biblical. Lets break down the weeks according to the prophecy."You sound just like Scar on the old boards except he claimed it was Francisco Ribera not Darby...
Maybe you should actually read the Ante-Nicene Fathers before commenting...
Irenaeus, taught by Polycarp, disciple of John...
And the angel Gabriel, when explaining his vision, states with regard to this person: "And towards the end of their kingdom a king of a most fierce countenance shall arise, one understanding [dark] questions, and exceedingly powerful, full of wonders; and he shall corrupt, direct, influence (faciet), and put strong men down, the holy people likewise; and his yoke shall be directed as a wreath [round their neck]; deceit shall be in his hand, and he shall be lifted up in his heart: he shall also ruin many by deceit, and lead many to perdition, bruising them in his hand like eggs." And then he points out the time that his tyranny shall last, during which the saints shall be put to flight, they who offer a pure sacrifice unto God: "And in the midst of the week," he says, "the sacrifice and the libation shall be taken away, and the abomination of desolation [shall be brought] into the temple: even unto the consummation of the time shall the desolation be complete." Now three years and six months constitute the half-week.
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 5, Chp. 25)
5. From all these passages are revealed to us, not merely the particulars of the apostasy, and [the doings] of him who concentrates in himself every satanic error, but also, that there is one and the same God the Father, who was declared by the prophets, but made manifest by Christ. For if what Daniel prophesied concerning the end has been confirmed by the Lord, when He said, "When ye shall see the abomination of desolation, which has been spoken of by Daniel the prophet"
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 5, Chp. 25)
But he indicates the number of the name now, that when this man comes we may avoid him, being aware of who he is:...But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, and sit in the temple in Jerusalem; and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom, that is, the rest, the hallowed seventh day; and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance, in which kingdom the Lord declared, that "many coming from the east and from the west should sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." –
(Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book 5, Chp. 30)
"For when the threescore and two weeks are fulfilled, and Christ is come, and the Gospel is preached in every place, the times being then accomplished, there will remain only one week, the last, in which Elias will appear, and Enoch, and in the midst of it the abomination of desolation will be manifested, viz., Antichrist, announcing desolation to the world...."
[Hippolytus, On Daniel, II, 22]
"Thus, then, does the prophet set forth these things concerning the Antichrist, who shall be shameless, a war-maker, and despot, who, exalting himself above all kings and above every God, shall build the city of Jerusalem, and restore the sanctuary. Him the impious will worship as God, and will bend to him the knee, thinking him to be the Christ. He shall cut off the two witnesses and forerunners of Christ, who proclaim His glorious kingdom from heaven, as it is said: 'And I will give (power) unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.' As also it was announced to Daniel: 'And one week shall confirm a covenant with many; and in the midst of the week it shall be that the sacrifice and oblation shall be removed' - that the one week might be shown to be divided into two. The two witnesses, then, shall preach three years and a half; and Antichrist shall make war upon the saints during the test of the week, and desolate the world, that what is written may be fulfilled: 'And they shall make the abomination of desolation for a thousand two hundred and ninety days.'
[Hippolytus, On Daniel, II, 39]
"And at first, indeed, that deceitful and lawless one, with crafty deceitfulness, will refuse such glory; but the men persisting, and holding by him, will declare him king. And thereafter he will be lifted up in heart, and he who was formerly gentle will become violent, and he who pursued love will become pitiless, and the humble in heart will become haughty and inhuman, and the hater of unrighteousness will persecute the righteous. Then, when he is elevated to his kingdom, he will marshal war; and in his wrath he will smite three mighty kings, - those, namely, of Egypt, Libya, and Ethiopia. And after that he will build the temple in Jerusalem, and will restore it again speedily, and give it over to the Jews. And then he will be lifted up in heart against every man; yea, he will speak blasphemy also against God, thinking in his deceit that he shall be king upon the earth hereafter for ever; not knowing, miserable wretch, that his kingdom is to be quickly brought to nought, and that he will quickly have to meet the fire which is prepared for him, along with all who trust him and serve him. For when Daniel said, 'I shall make my covenant for one week,' he indicated seven years; and the one half of the week is for the preaching of the prophets, and for the other half of the week - that is to say, for three years and a half - Antichrist will reign upon the earth. And after this his kingdom and his glory shall be taken away. Behold, ye who love God, what manner of tribulation there shall rise in those days, such as has not been from the foundation of the world, no, nor ever shall be, except in those days alone. Then the lawless one, being lifted up in heart, will gather together his demons in man's form, and will abominate those who call him to the kingdom, and will pollute many souls."
[Appendix to the Works of Hippolytus, XXV]
Now Daniel will set forth this subject to us. For he says, And one week will make a covenant with many, and it shall be that in the midst (half) of the week my sacrifice and oblation shall cease. By one week, therefore, he meant the last week which is to be at the end of the whole world of which week the two prophets Enoch and Elias will take up the half. For they will preach 1,260 days clothed in sackcloth, proclaiming repentance to the people and to all the nations. For John says, And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. [Hippolytus - Treatise on Christ and Antichrist, 43]
I disagree but I'll leave it at that. I respect your opinion but you are sincerely wrong. God bless.David was from Bethlehem. 1st Samuel 17:12 Now David was the son of the Ephrathite from Bethlehem of Judah named Jesse.
Isaiah 11:1 Then a shoot shoot will spring from the stem of Jesse, And a branch from his roots will bear fruit. The Spirit of the LORD will rest on Him, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and strength, The spirit of knowledge and the fear of the LORD. And He will delight in the fear of the LORD, And He will not judge by what His eyes see, Nor make a decision by what His ears hear; read more.
But with righteousness He will judge the poor, And decide with fairness for the afflicted of the earth; And He will strike the earth with the rod of His mouth, And with the breath of His lips He will slay the wicked. Also righteousness will be the belt about His loins, And faithfulness the belt about His waist.....
Jeremiah 8:9 They will serve the Lord their God and David their king whom I will raise up for them
Ezekiel 37:24 “ My servant David will be king, and they will have one shepherd (Ezekiel 34:23). They will walk in my judicial decisions and carefully observe my statues. They will dwell on the land that I gave to my servant Jacob where your forefathers lived and they will dwell on it forever, they and their children’s children and David my servant will be their chieftain forever.
So again right off the back you are misinterpreting scriptures. I told you we can go prophesy for prophecy.
Daniel's prophecy does not say the last week anywhere. The one week of the seventy weeks is not separated by 2000 years from the other 69 weeks. That isn't biblical. Lets break down the weeks according to the prophecy."
"Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
"And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."
"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate" (Daniel 9:25-27).
The angel gives a breakdown of the 70 weeks as follows:
7 weeks of years for rebuilding of Jerusalem (verse 25)
62 weeks of years to the Messiah (verses 25-26)
1 week of years to the close of the period (verse 27)
The one week is to close the period of the 70 weeks (490 years) that God cut off for Israel. So how can that be at the time of the antichrist? The Bible mentions the antichrist in prophecy and where it will dealt with.
So one half of the 1 week (7 years), Jesus "shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease". Only He can do that because of His crucifixion that brings and end to the sacrifices that Jews performed in their temple because they represented Jesus' sacrifice. they were Three and half years later Stephen is stonerd to death and the leaders of Israel through their actions for the last time reject Christ and that end their time as a chosen people. then the prophets take the message to the gentiles.
Thats right Thunder, since I no longer believe in Dispensationalism I am a heretic, guess you now believe one must accept Dispensationalism to be saved.Just you and the people you listen to.
I have read from them, showing one or two people vs the entire History of the Church equals out to about 99% wouldnt you say?Maybe you should actually read the Ante-Nicene Fathers before commenting...
You can believe in a heresy and still be saved.Thats right Thunder, since I no longer believe in Dispensationalism I am a heretic, guess you now believe one must accept Dispensationalism to be saved.
It is sad when people incorporate their Eschatology into Salvation. Here is the 100% Truth, you nor I nor any human that has every existed really knows what is going to happen when Christ comes back, what order will take place, if there will or will not be a literal millennium ect ect ect.
Simeon knew. In Luke 2, when Mary and Joseph take Jesus to the ancient capital city ofName one human that knew how Christ was going to come the 1st time? No one knew or understood correctly, not even the Disciples that were living with Him understood correctly.
No one thinks your view on Israel is a salvational issue. But that's no reason to be content with being wrong.If God actually deals with Israel as a Nation in some End Time Scenario then so be it, in reality it wont affect me or my standing with God. I dont believe He would say Daciple, I know you believed in me for Salvation but since you thought the Church replaced Israel you are going to Hell. I also dont believe He would say the same to you or anyone else. If God doesnt deal with Israel as a Nation, is that really going to affect your Salvation? If so then your Salvation isnt actually in Christ and that would be where I would worry...
You and I are brothers in Jesus Christ, there's no doubt in my mind about that. We'll have a good laugh about it at the marriage supper of the Lamb. The Rapture will happen to everyone who has believed on Jesus Christ, whether they believe in the Rapture or not. And since we'll have glorified bodies, and minds like Christ, I will be able to resist the temptation to say, "I told you so!"You are a brother to me Thunder, but it is ok if you dont view me as one, I am sure if we both believe in Christ as our Personal Lord and Savior we will see each other in either Heaven or be with Christ on Earth and we can sit back and laugh at how silly we were concerning this nonsense...
So you think Simeon knew HOW Jesus would fulfill that role? You think Simeon knew Jesus was going to die and be Crucified? You think He knew the details and exactly how they were going to play out?In Luke 2, when Mary and Joseph take Jesus to the ancient capital city ofthe PalestiniansIsrael, Jerusalem, to present him to God at theDome of the RockTemple. Simeon knows exactly who Jesus is, and what his role will be.
I agree you should probably come to the Truth that the Church has taken Israels place, if you read your Bible more you would know that all the Promises to Abraham have been given to us by Faith.But that's no reason to be content with being wrong.
Yes I believe that we will laugh about it when Christ comes in the middle of a horrible Tribulation that if it takes place in your lifetime, you are wondering why you are having to endure, and then He destroys this Earth and we will sit together in the New Heavens and New Earth enjoying all the Promises of Israel together!!!You and I are brothers in Jesus Christ, there's no doubt in my mind about that. We'll have a good laugh about it at the marriage supper of the Lamb. The Rapture will happen to everyone who has believed on Jesus Christ, whether they believe in the Rapture or not. And since we'll have glorified bodies, and minds like Christ, I will be able to resist the temptation to say, "I told you so!"
Why would the Church Fathers understand the whole prophecy in Daniel 9 if it's completion was almost 2000 years in future ? What would they do with that knowledge ? We got to study the Scriptures ourselves and not only rely on the interpretation of others. There is a time for everything and the early Church had absolutely no need to know that 2000 years in the future... you get my point.I have read from them, showing one or two people vs the entire History of the Church equals out to about 99% wouldnt you say?
I have read from them, showing one or two people vs the entire History of the Church equals out to about 99% wouldnt you say?
Written anonymously around 100 AD, the “Epistle of Barnabas” is the earliest extra-Canonical source we have. Although not included in the Canon of the New Testament, it is an incredibly early documentation of the early Church’s beliefs about the last days. The Apostle John was probably alive when it was written. And although the authorship is disputed, we will refer to Barnabas as the author.
The Epistle of Barnabas sets forth the common view held by the early Church that the seventieth week of Daniel ended with the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD, as Messiah’s Day dawned and Christ’s Church was born. Barnabas writes, "For it is written, ‘And it shall come to pass, when the week is completed, the temple of God shall be built...in the name of the Lord.’ I find...that a temple does exist. Having received the forgiveness of sins…in our habitation God dwells in us….This is the spiritual temple built for the Lord." (EOB, 16:6)
Barnabas uses the expression "the week," but does not mention Daniel. Yet scholars agree from the context that this is definitely a reference to Daniel’s 70th week. And it is assumed by many scholars that the prophecy of Daniel’s seventy weeks was so well known and so widely expounded in the early Church that it needed no further explanation. The early Church did not avoid Daniel’s prophecy.
This early Christian writer connects Daniel’s vision of seventy weeks with the prophecy of Haggai 2:7-9 and the building of a "spiritual temple," the Church. The author of the Epistle of Barnabas obviously believed that Daniel’s 70th week was fulfilled with Christ’s first advent. This was when the Old Temple was destroyed and the new “spiritual temple” was initially established. Writing in 100 AD he clearly believed the 70th week of Daniel was already completed.
It seems clear from this passage in the Epistle of Barnabas that less than a century after Christ’s passion (remember that according to Daniel the Messiah would be cut off in the middle of the 70th week), it was the widespread belief of the Church that the 70th week of Daniel was completed. It is certain that Barnabas placed the end of the 70th week no later than 70 AD. His mention of the building of the Church (which was able to grow largely unimpeded after 70AD) makes it probable that Barnabas saw 67 to 70 AD and the destruction of Herod’s Temple as the end of the Jewish or Old Covenant Age and the dawning of Messiah’s Day. As David B. Currie writes in his book, Rapture, The End-Times Error That Leaves The Bible Behind, "He (Barnabas) assumes his readers will agree that the events of ‘the week’ led to the building of the Church.” (Page 422)
CLEMENT OF ALEXANDREA
Within a century of Barnabas, Clement became bishop of Alexandria until his death in 215 AD. Clement taught that the blessings of the New Covenant required the end of biblical Judaism within the 70 weeks of Daniel.Clement writes of the destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 AD in the prophetic language of Daniel’s seventy weeks, "Vespasian rose to the supreme power (Emperor of Rome) and destroyed Jerusalem, and desolated the holy place” (STO, XXI, 142-143).
Clement of Alexandrea believed the Jewish Age, the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel and the great tribulation were behind, not ahead of the Church.
ORIGEN (185-254 AD)
A student of Clement of Alexandrea, Origen agreed that the destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 AD marked the end of the Jewish Age and the fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy regarding the 70 weeks. Origen writes, "The weeks of years up to the time of Christ the leader that Daniel the prophet predicted were fulfilled" (TPR, IV:1:5).
Like Clement, Origen also believed the Jewish Age, the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel and the great tribulation were behind the Church, not ahead of it.
TERTULLIAN
In 203 AD Tertullian wrote his famous treatise Against The Jews. This early Church father also taught that Daniel’s 70th week had been fulfilled in 70 AD: "Vespasian vanquished the Jews…and so by the date of his storming Jerusalem, the Jews had completed the seventy weeks foretold by Daniel” (AAJ, VII; CID).
Contrary to modern postponement preachers and teachers, Tertullian believed the Jewish age, the abomination of desolation, and the great tribulation was behind, not ahead of the Church.
ATHANASIUS
Athanasius was bishop of Alexandria from 326 to 373 AD. Like the early Church fathers before him, he also taught that the 70 weeks of Daniel culminated and the Jewish Age ended in 70 AD: "Jerusalem is to stand till His coming (Daniel’s reference to Messiah’s appearing in His First Advent), and thenceforth, prophet and vision cease in Israel (the end of the Old Covenant or Jewish Age). This is why Jerusalem stood till then…that they might be exercised in the types as a preparation for the reality…but from that time forth all prophecy is sealed and the city and Temple taken" (INC, XXXIX:3-XV:8).
Athanasius clearly reflects the view of the entire early Church: once the Messiah had come, the role of the Temple in Jerusalem would be ended. “Things to be done which belonged to Jerusalem beneath…were fulfilled, and those which belonged to the shadows had passed away” (FEL, IV:3-4).
This important early Church father clearly believed that the Jewish age ended in 70 AD with the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.
IRENAEUS AND HIPPOLYTUS
Irenaeus was a contemporary of Clement of Alexandrea whose widely held view we dealt with above. Irenaeus and his pupil Hippolytus are the only two writers from the early Church period who believed in a still-future fulfillment of Daniel’s 70th week. They both placed the 70th week at the end of the gospel age and so are the first interpreters to postulate a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks (AG, V). Both predicted a specific date for the second coming that has long since come and gone.
But their belief in a future 70th week was never widely accepted! St. Jerome specifically pointed out that the number of years in their system did not coincide with the historical events they purported to cover. He wrote, "If by any chance those of future generations should not see these predictions of his (Irenaeus) fulfilled at the time he (Irenaeus) set, then they will be forced to seek for some other solution and to convict the teacher himself (Irenaeus) of erroneous interpretation” (CID)
David B. Currie points out in his scholarly work, "As a point of history, the views of Irenaeus did give seed to premillennialism. But the early fathers of the Church strongly and universally denounced this concept. The early Church understood the presumptuous-parenthesis theory that rapturists employ…but they resoundingly rejected it.” (David B. Currie, Rapture, page 425)
The prevailing view of the early Church fathers was that Daniel’s vision of the 70 weeks was fulfilled in 70 AD. The final or 70th week began with the baptism of Jesus and his presentation to Israel by John the Baptist. The Messiah was cut off in the middle of the 70th week when Jesus was crucified. The abomination of desolation and the great tribulation spoken of by Daniel were fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple by the Romans in 70 AD.
http://georgekouri.com/the-early-church-fathers-and-the-last-days-of-the-jewish-age
Not so. When God makes a promise, he keeps it. The promises God made to Abraham and his seed were to be fulfilled upon Abraham's literal descendants. That disqualifies anyone who can't trace their lineage back to Abraham. I can't. Can you?God bestows upon the converted Christians all the privileges and promises that had been made to the literal seed of Abraham (Galatians 3:26-29). Now converted Christians assume the role of Israel, and the Christian church absorbs the status of the temple or sanctuary of God. The Scriptures make this abundantly clear in such texts as Romans 2:28,29; Ephesians 2:11-13; 19-22; and 1 Peter 2:5.